Fuck off Tragic, everyone who's voted for me on this debate has also voted against me in past debates. It's called integrity.
The eye-roll smiley's right here:

tentative wrote:But you're right about one thing: I'd vote against you on any subject
Trajicomic wrote:Stoic, let this become a lesson to you, that no matter how well you make a point, or argue, that popularity wins in the end. Get some "friends" to come vote for you, if you want to participate in any "philosophy" here.
Were the arguments even necessary? Should have just skipped the thread, and went straight to voting. The same results would have transpired.
tentative wrote:Tab has to win the vote, but more because stoic failed to press his case. There are many examples of benevolent dictatorship that weren't mentioned. Both democracy and dictatorship have their strengths and weaknesses.
Tab, your argument boils down to: Quick death = dictatorship
Slow death = democracy
All governmental systems eventually fail because humans refuse to pay attention. The only choice seems to be hung or decapitated -vs- being nibbled to death by rats...
It's not easy becoming objective and as SELFLESS as I am, you know!!!
Also i agree with that anlogy above but am confused on how he decided to go with it, so are you saying you'd rather die a slow death than a quick death?
I believe uglypeoplefucking counts as the only "objective" vote so far, and that puts the score at 1-0 for Tab. Pavolvianmodel, faust, tentative, anitas, any moderator on ILP in general, should not count as votes to Tab, due to bias. And as far as pav goes, voting one time against Tab, compared to the other 9 times you voted for him in other debates, does not constitute an "objective" position. Your fairness is compromised, as, you are also a moderator on this website.
PavlovianModel146 wrote:what do you want?
Trajicomic wrote:PavlovianModel146 wrote:what do you want?
Tab needs to test his metal....no more easy wins and gimmes. He's not challenging himself by his friends' constantly hanging around and supporting him. He's become lazy and decadent in his arguing.
That's why I'm calling for some objective impartial voters, and judges. Otherwise what's the point of voting? What's the point of DEMOCRACY?!?!?!
Stoic is right......why are we even VOTING on who wins a DEMOCRACY VS DICTATOR debate?
A dictator should decide instead!!! Fuck voting!
Trajicomic wrote:barcelonic doesn't have the 100 post minimum, so his vote doesn't count.
It looks like Tab's friends have come into the thread, voting for him subjectively, not based on any actual content of argument. The votes are based on loyalty and subjective bias, nothing more.
You don't even need to read the arguments of the debate, to know the outcome of this mockery of a "vote". Where is the eye roll smiley?
tentative wrote:If it is, hurry...
Trajicomic wrote:PavlovianModel146 wrote:what do you want?
Tab needs to test his metal....no more easy wins and gimmes. He's not challenging himself by his friends' constantly hanging around and supporting him. He's become lazy and decadent in his arguing.
That's why I'm calling for some objective impartial voters, and judges. Otherwise what's the point of voting? What's the point of DEMOCRACY?!?!?!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users