On Lewd PM's

A forum about the forums

Moderator: Carleas

On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Mon May 23, 2016 5:42 pm

Recently, the lawyer Carleas, sent me a warning not to send weak-minded individuals lewd PM's.

I sent a message to the ape, that I do not care.

I simply don't.

In a desperate attempt to dominate me, he, in a fit, removed my ability to send PM's.

So, if you need to communicate with me, I apologize for Carleas' tantrum.


Let us discuss the irrelevance of the human social construct and their tribal ideologies. And how artistic, beautiful and Lewd PM's are not inherently evil, nor is there any reason to remove them, except due to reasons of social psychosis.

I put this in the religious forum, because it is very much a symptom similar to the symptoms of religious psychosis.
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Harbal » Mon May 23, 2016 6:02 pm

Could you post an example of an artistic, beautiful and Lewd PM? If there are any censorship issues you may be able to justify it by calling it exhibit A.
User avatar
Harbal
Thinker
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 12:53 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby The Golden Turd » Mon May 23, 2016 6:09 pm

Feel free to PM me a long written message once you have your PMs returned. You'll find the experience once sent is very rewarding.
Support "The Angels of East Africa" on smile.Amazon.com it is free to do, they donate 0.05% of your purchase cost to them, or give donations directly via:

http://www.machinegunpreacher.org

Image

Recently hidden post:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=192227&p=2649513#p2649513
User avatar
The Golden Turd
Fucking Unflushable
 
Posts: 9450
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:37 am
Location: Apparently Well Up Manical Mongoose's Ass

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Mon May 23, 2016 6:35 pm

Unfortunately, I fear I can do neither suggestion A nor B.

For suggestion A
You see, the primates are on patrol, and they would not take very kindly to posting anything against their tribe's customs.

For suggestion B
I am unable to do so, at this present moment.

A very interesting question is, why was the upstanding member Jerkey's private messaging privileges removed?
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby iambiguous » Mon May 23, 2016 6:48 pm

....one more reason to be thankful that human existence is essentially meaningless and absurd.

Unless of course it's not. Then, by all means, let's resolve this. :-k
He was like a man who wanted to change all; and could not; so burned with his impotence; and had only me, an infinitely small microcosm to convert or detest. John Fowles

Start here: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=176529
Then here: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=185296
And here: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=194382
User avatar
iambiguous
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 36441
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: baltimore maryland

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Carleas » Mon May 23, 2016 7:35 pm

It's not the lewdness per se; consensual lewdness via PM is none of my business. But you were sexually harassing someone by sending them pornographic PMs; it was non-consensual, unrequited, harassment.
User Control Panel > Board preference > Edit display options > Display signatures: No.
Carleas
Magister Ludi
 
Posts: 6096
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:10 pm
Location: Washington DC, USA

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby surreptitious57 » Mon May 23, 2016 7:59 pm

You are back Trixie. I thought you had left for good. I hope you will be staying
this time. But try not to sexually harass anyone if you can as it is not very nice
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN
surreptitious57
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 2:05 am

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Mon May 23, 2016 8:26 pm

Carleas wrote:It's not the lewdness per se; consensual lewdness via PM is none of my business. But you were sexually harassing someone by sending them pornographic PMs; it was non-consensual, unrequited, harassment.


Sexual harassment occurs in nature, and as usual the aggressors are usually chased off by the resident alpha males.

There is nothing new here, it is merely a play of primates. The only difference is, these particular set of primates are offended by beautiful masterpieces, yet, watching documentaries of naked baboons do not offend them. The tastes, are inverted of what they should be.
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Mon May 23, 2016 8:29 pm

iambiguous wrote:....one more reason to be thankful that human existence is essentially meaningless and absurd.

Unless of course it's not. Then, by all means, let's resolve this. :-k


It is not meaningless perse, it is about machines acquiring energies to further more complexities or in MTV's case, increase more chaoscentricities.

In my opinion, biological machines are superior to metal monstrosities. This could be theist's supportive argument, that God would make the ultimate machine using DNA, rather than wires and motors.

Absurd belongs of the topic of consciousness.
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Carleas » Mon May 23, 2016 8:45 pm

Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:Sexual harassment occurs in nature...

Humans are a part of nature, so yeah, of course it does. And the reasoned arguments against it, and the prohibition and punishment that follow from them, also occur in nature.
User Control Panel > Board preference > Edit display options > Display signatures: No.
Carleas
Magister Ludi
 
Posts: 6096
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:10 pm
Location: Washington DC, USA

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Mon May 23, 2016 8:51 pm

Carleas wrote:
Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:Sexual harassment occurs in nature...

Humans are a part of nature, so yeah, of course it does. And the reasoned arguments against it, and the prohibition and punishment that follow from them, also occur in nature.


Which I stated but mr. busy is too busy to read more than the first 5 words.
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby The Golden Turd » Mon May 23, 2016 9:19 pm

The "reasoned prohibition and punishments" hardly exist amongst the squirrels Carleas. The ones in DC bite your fingers when you feed them Reese's Pieces, and run up trees when you try to smack them. They apparently have a lot of experience in this.
Support "The Angels of East Africa" on smile.Amazon.com it is free to do, they donate 0.05% of your purchase cost to them, or give donations directly via:

http://www.machinegunpreacher.org

Image

Recently hidden post:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=192227&p=2649513#p2649513
User avatar
The Golden Turd
Fucking Unflushable
 
Posts: 9450
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:37 am
Location: Apparently Well Up Manical Mongoose's Ass

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Harbal » Mon May 23, 2016 9:36 pm

In the interests of freedom of information, which is a very important principle, the contents of the lewd PMs should be put into the public domain, along with UP 1001's reason for sending them and the identity of the recipient. This has nothing to do with my own personal curiosity, by the way.
User avatar
Harbal
Thinker
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 12:53 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Mon May 23, 2016 9:52 pm

I am inclined to agree with Harbal, as for the reason I was simply astounded by the beauty of the art, and wished to share. If only those beautiful things with which we share have their hearts open.

trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Amorphos » Mon May 23, 2016 10:51 pm

Looks like I missed out on all the fun.
The truth is naked,
Once it is written it is lost.
Genius is the result of the entire product of man.
The cosmic insignificance of humanity, shows the cosmic insignificance of a universe without humanity.
the fully painted picture, reveals an empty canvas
User avatar
Amorphos
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7052
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: infinity

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Mon May 23, 2016 10:57 pm

Amorphos wrote:Looks like I missed out on all the fun.


Being banned, or kicked in the cahones, is never a "fun" ordeal.
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Mr Reasonable » Mon May 23, 2016 10:58 pm

Stopping sexual harassment is censorship Carleas! You're a nazi!
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.
Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

What exactly is logic? -Magnus Anderson

Support the innocence project on AmazonSmile instead of Turd's African savior biker dude.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 26064
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Mon May 23, 2016 10:58 pm

Mr Reasonable wrote:Stopping sexual harassment is censorship Carleas! You're a nazi!


A tyrant yes, but not all tyrants are nazis.
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Amorphos » Mon May 23, 2016 11:41 pm

Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:
Amorphos wrote:Looks like I missed out on all the fun.


Being banned, or kicked in the cahones, is never a "fun" ordeal.


I dare say not. ...but I meant...
The truth is naked,
Once it is written it is lost.
Genius is the result of the entire product of man.
The cosmic insignificance of humanity, shows the cosmic insignificance of a universe without humanity.
the fully painted picture, reveals an empty canvas
User avatar
Amorphos
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7052
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: infinity

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Arcturus Descending » Fri May 27, 2016 3:10 pm

Ultimate Philosophy 1001

.
.. not to send weak-minded individuals lewd PM's.



weak-mind·ed
ˌ
lacking determination, emotional strength, or intellectual capacity.

having or showing a lack of mental firmness; irresolute; vacillating

lacking in judgment or good sense : foolish b : feebleminded.


That's weak-minded among other words and phrases...

Apparently, Trixie, your definition of weak-minded is accepting, with no holds barred, everything and anything which you deem to give...
Why would you think that anyone in here has to be happy or accepting of lewd or raunchy PMs which you send and they do not want?


dominate?
A bit of projection going on there, Trixie.



how artistic, beautiful and Lewd PM's are

Let's not forget that one man's or woman's meat is another's poison.
There is art and then there is Art.


not inherently evil, nor is there any reason to remove them, except due to reasons of social psychosis.

No, certainly not evil, but not aesthetically beautiful or preferred to some, nor asked for.
We reject what turns us off and we have a right to especially when a No has already been stated.


I put this in the religious forum, because it is very much a symptom similar to the symptoms of religious psychosis.


I would have put it in the Psychology forum.
Religious psychosis? Would that be the same as rejecting what is not aesthetically pleasing to us but rather so-far distant to that? Would that be the same as rejecting what there is no rhyme or reason for within one's own mind - not by a long shot?

If someone in particular has no problem with being sent lewd PMs after they've been asked, then by all means, send them but not everyone feels like you - some don't wish to receive them nor do they wish to send them.
Some things are a question of personal "taste" and "privacy" boundaries being usurped. It is not a good thing to cross some bridges.
"Look closely. The beautiful may be small."


"Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the oftener and more steadily we reflect on them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me."


“Whereas the beautiful is limited, the sublime is limitless, so that the mind in the presence of the sublime, attempting to imagine what it cannot, has pain in the failure but pleasure in contemplating the immensity of the attempt.”

Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Arcturus Descending
Consciousness Seeker
 
Posts: 15682
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: A state of unknowing

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Sat May 28, 2016 12:43 am

one man's meal is another man's poison
art and Art

I give you a fine meal, which many people would and do appreciate. Yet you are like the little kid, who complains when I take him out to eat at a 5 star restaurant, saying it makes him sick and begging for fried foods as the remedy.

We reject what turns us off and we have a right to especially when a No has already been stated.

I never gave you the chance to say No. You are gonna eat it and you are gonna like it, woman.

Weakminded

Weakminded is running away at a fake 3d rendering of a naked person, and calling the nearest authority figure for help.
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Arcturus Descending » Sat May 28, 2016 2:56 pm

Ultimate Philosophy 1001


I give you a fine meal, which many people would and do appreciate. Yet you are like the little kid, who complains when I take him out to eat at a 5 star restaurant, saying it makes him sick and begging for fried foods as the remedy.


If you're taking a little kid out for a meal, he would most probably appreciate what he "likes", where Mommy and Daddy usually take him.
Really? How many women would appreciate the kind of meal you extended? Well, who knows? Perhaps many would have laughed them off but people have a right to their own choices or are you so narcissistic as to believe that what is given is what is to be preferred - no matter what it is?

I never gave you the chance to say No. You are gonna eat it and you are gonna like it, woman.

People sometimes have a tendency to do things without being conscious of their ulterior motives. These are sometimes "reactions" or can be called passive aggressiveness. One might intuit that that was where you were coming from - especially since there was an adamant No.
You did give the chance to say No. The No was given and you simply ignored it.
But we all do that at times under different circumstances BUT sometimes we go too far and our behavior backfires on us.


Weakminded is running away at a fake 3d rendering of a naked person, and calling the nearest authority figure for help.

That would be your choice of words BUT perhaps the person involved thought of it as gross, raunchy and highly inappropriate. Did you take the time to reflect on what you were going to do beforehand?
Perhaps the narcissist in you feels that the only way for someone to feel about it is as you "believe" they ought to feel? I would think that by now you might have intuited otherwise.
Also, they really were not necessary as I do understand where you are coming from but words, as you have already expressed them in posts, would have been a far better way to show yourself.
"Look closely. The beautiful may be small."


"Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the oftener and more steadily we reflect on them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me."


“Whereas the beautiful is limited, the sublime is limitless, so that the mind in the presence of the sublime, attempting to imagine what it cannot, has pain in the failure but pleasure in contemplating the immensity of the attempt.”

Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Arcturus Descending
Consciousness Seeker
 
Posts: 15682
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: A state of unknowing

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Sat May 28, 2016 6:15 pm

Arcturus Descending wrote:Really? How many women would appreciate the kind of meal you extended? Well, who knows? Perhaps many would have laughed them off but people have a right to their own choices or are you so narcissistic as to believe that what is given is what is to be preferred - no matter what it is?

Probably over 5000. When I was a kid I didn't like tofu, soysauce and broccoli, now I do. People are too brainwashed to know what they want or don't want.

You did give the chance to say No.

No I didn't.

highly inappropriate. Did you take the time to reflect on what you were going to do beforehand?

Yes and I don't care, people who use words like "highly inappropriate" try to dominate us with rules and regs and live in boring restrictive environments. Essentially, they try to make us unhappy and control us.

words, as you have already expressed them in posts, would have been a far better way to show yourself.

If I had already expressed them before, why do it again? That's repetitive and flat.

Thing is, Arc, I was molested in my earlier days. I was just like you, running away. Told them to stop. Said to everyone I didn't like it, told myself I didn't like it. But thing is, looking back, deep down, I really did need it. You don't know what you want or need.
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Arcturus Descending » Sat May 28, 2016 6:48 pm

We don't always know what we want or need. This is true. But only a narcissist is going to tell me, presume to know, what I want and need, especially in a case like this.

I know some of your story but it isn't My Story. We're both human but we obviously think and feel differently in a lot of respects. It would be impossible that we didn't based on our own living experiences.

People need to pay better attention to what they see, what is actually there, and not base their observations and conclusions on desire/wishful thinking/whims...

You know, I saw the movie video recently "The Danish Girl". I thought it was both beautiful and inspiring. I don't know if you saw it. I think that people can reach a better understanding, if they can transcend some of their biases, of what people go through in their life experiences in dealing with transgender issues believing in their heart of hearts that they clearly were not the gender which life imposed on them. As I said, it was inspiring that a human being could be so capable of not giving up on what they know or at least believed to be true and following that all the way to the end, no matter what. The movie was heartbreaking but at the same time, she lived her dream or her purpose - to the last.

That was her story.
"Look closely. The beautiful may be small."


"Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the oftener and more steadily we reflect on them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me."


“Whereas the beautiful is limited, the sublime is limitless, so that the mind in the presence of the sublime, attempting to imagine what it cannot, has pain in the failure but pleasure in contemplating the immensity of the attempt.”

Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Arcturus Descending
Consciousness Seeker
 
Posts: 15682
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: A state of unknowing

Re: On Lewd PM's

Postby Ultimate Philosophy 1001 » Sun May 29, 2016 11:53 pm

Would you say that you are narcissistic in some ways, Arc?
trogdor
User avatar
Ultimate Philosophy 1001
BANNED
 
Posts: 8311
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:57 pm

Next

Return to Meta



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users