Artimas wrote:Are we all attached to each other via subconscious and a collective consciousness? Fragmented fractal existing.
The subconscious is what guilt, love, intuition, dreams and morality stem from, not to mention ideas, it is interesting how ideas may only come to us and not us to them. It would seem as if knowledge seems to be memory and not something new, we merely remember.
We are all one energy, one thing. Like a bees hive. When in alignment we are God in full power, it is a collective painting fragmented into different pieces, we are each a piece of this collective image and what we choose to do in this life defines and projects reality as we see it, outside of the natural laws. We are living a continuous circle, the snake eating it's own head, a representation of eternity. We are born and in that first flash of light we experience pain, existence. We live as a unique consciousness, separate from all of the rest, this is the ego, the identity of which may be shaped by environment. Genetics establish what your advantages and disadvantages are biologically, not the full personality otherwise personality would never change, it does change, it changes daily and it is inevitable, the choice an individual has is to delay or speed up this changing of identity and to also pick whatever ideals it wishes to represent both you it and it you. Humans may be easily indoctrinated by ideology and environment, everyone has pain and some fear to learn from this, they do not want the responsibility of knowing how to fix their own issues because it is easier to say you don't know as an excuse and some individuals will even attempt to bring another down to their level so they can relate, hence use a stronger reasoning for it to be an excuse of why they can't or don't feel they need to recognize the self. This is a psychological trap and one should always try to learn from their pain and struggling for if they do not they liveth in ignorance and death shalt be their food.
The subconscious is relative to the female and the ego relative to the male. Male and female is in all and that is why, some males feel more feminine than others, they feel a lot and avoid being dominated by the ego, the key is to find balance between identity and the spectator(subconscious) and vice versa with females wanting to dominate males. We are the actor and director, spectated and spectator, male and female, light and dark, chaotic and order, evil and justice, destroyer and creator, lover and fighter, human and animal, consciousness and subconscious.
Love yourself and learn from within, all answers come from within your own seeking to learn. All one has is their will and heart, don't let either be tainted.
We are God broken into fragments. It is here all along watching silently with no bias because the judgement we feel is already internally integrated into our existing, that is guilt, the demons, the weight of which one feels when they understand the intricacies and repercussions of their actions if ill intentioned.
I will stop here. I will add more when I can or feel the urge.
<3 Learn in the light, reflect in the dark.
Meno_ wrote:Artimas wrote:Are we all attached to each other via subconscious and a collective consciousness? Fragmented fractal existing.
The subconscious is what guilt, love, intuition, dreams and morality stem from, not to mention ideas, it is interesting how ideas may only come to us and not us to them. It would seem as if knowledge seems to be memory and not something new, we merely remember.
We are all one energy, one thing. Like a bees hive. When in alignment we are God in full power, it is a collective painting fragmented into different pieces, we are each a piece of this collective image and what we choose to do in this life defines and projects reality as we see it, outside of the natural laws. We are living a continuous circle, the snake eating it's own head, a representation of eternity. We are born and in that first flash of light we experience pain, existence. We live as a unique consciousness, separate from all of the rest, this is the ego, the identity of which may be shaped by environment. Genetics establish what your advantages and disadvantages are biologically, not the full personality otherwise personality would never change, it does change, it changes daily and it is inevitable, the choice an individual has is to delay or speed up this changing of identity and to also pick whatever ideals it wishes to represent both you it and it you. Humans may be easily indoctrinated by ideology and environment, everyone has pain and some fear to learn from this, they do not want the responsibility of knowing how to fix their own issues because it is easier to say you don't know as an excuse and some individuals will even attempt to bring another down to their level so they can relate, hence use a stronger reasoning for it to be an excuse of why they can't or don't feel they need to recognize the self. This is a psychological trap and one should always try to learn from their pain and struggling for if they do not they liveth in ignorance and death shalt be their food.
The subconscious is relative to the female and the ego relative to the male. Male and female is in all and that is why, some males feel more feminine than others, they feel a lot and avoid being dominated by the ego, the key is to find balance between identity and the spectator(subconscious) and vice versa with females wanting to dominate males. We are the actor and director, spectated and spectator, male and female, light and dark, chaotic and order, evil and justice, destroyer and creator, lover and fighter, human and animal, consciousness and subconscious.
Love yourself and learn from within, all answers come from within your own seeking to learn. All one has is their will and heart, don't let either be tainted.
We are God broken into fragments. It is here all along watching silently with no bias because the judgement we feel is already internally integrated into our existing, that is guilt, the demons, the weight of which one feels when they understand the intricacies and repercussions of their actions if ill intentioned.
I will stop here. I will add more when I can or feel the urge.
<3 Learn in the light, reflect in the dark.
Can You feel it now?
Meno_ wrote:Your very presumptive of things like the idea that janitors are so low, as to be playing a suppressed part in the subconscious. Now I know that my narrative was expected, and need not explain that even in terms of an typical response.
In fact there is no need to wrap that around ones brain, since here at ILP there exists a high level of. synchronicity.
Meno_ wrote:Maintenance qua. Janitorial efforts is like picking up after others, and it is in sinch with glossing and waxing, for tomorrow comes, and it starts all over.
A janitor is a failed teacher, because, .........because, by his actions he tried to convey his frustration of others not noticing what neatness and cleanliness imply.
But if they were to learn to be neat and clean, and even clean up after, he may face less days less hours resulting in considerable savings to the Institution but less income for him albeit he could gain free time to pursue hobbies and such.
That's for a start. Then there would be loss if income, and he could pursue other things and maybe take on more pride. But that's complicated and too much pride, well He couldn't have it, leveled out between an assumed quality, like spending the diminished income by inadverantly raising quality of life through quantifiable less substance to live on and his chillin.
Later
Meno_ wrote:Jesus yes. He may have been overwhelmed by the realization of walking a subliminal path, once it has been recognized by others of the fatefullness of that artifactual chore, yet exemplified by others.
That too was a determined and predictable outcome. A janitor or a simple minded person may not be prepared to even such a simple minded occupation.
This over the top interpretation of the simplest of intents, plays havoc of trying to appear humble and patient in an era of urgency.
So what happens to humility? It goes south into the very unconsciousness of its beginning, and repeats over and over, forever haunted by the magic of the miracle, again giving the Preception of a hallucinated and delerioys magical haunting, tested, not as a real hallucination like a Moses and a burning bush, but a decisive attempt to expand itself a la Dali.
It is not a matter of ' as it were', but, as it should be, or should have been. The understanding of it defies its rhetoric, by way of the will to understand.
Saint Francis said, 'First seek to understand, then be understood." Everyone thinks that's a quote from Steven Covey since it's one of his Seven Habits. But if you go back and research, you'll find it was first spoken by Saint Francis of Assisi in the 1200's.
Both of them had it backward. St Francis, because it was 1200. Who knew anything back then? Covey, beacuse he copied it, rather than created it."
It meant an emergence back then, one, merely an appearance. It is tangential to being humble, because of the nature of humility. It cuts both ways, hence open to misrepresentation.
It is as if, it is through the father that the son is understood.
Sad for the son. A catch 22 of no existential exit, into the nothingness from which leaps are prohibitive. Sound familiar, you folkships?
Meno_ wrote:Removed
Meno_ wrote:For lack of time. Thus Sprach. Zarathustra. More later.
Me know?
Meno_ wrote:It seems to me that more and more, the inner world is denied and exfoliated to the level of the obvious.
Artimas wrote:Meno_ wrote:It seems to me that more and more, the inner world is denied and exfoliated to the level of the obvious.
It seems as common sense to me personally but to others who can’t escape the control of their ego, the tyrant, common sense is elusive. I have thought this as well, that as more awaken to discover the self the faster and easier it is for the rest to see and understand, if this is what you are meaning.
Meno_ wrote:Artimas wrote:Meno_ wrote:It seems to me that more and more, the inner world is denied and exfoliated to the level of the obvious.
It seems as common sense to me personally but to others who can’t escape the control of their ego, the tyrant, common sense is elusive. I have thought this as well, that as more awaken to discover the self the faster and easier it is for the rest to see and understand, if this is what you are meaning.
The ego can't escape the control of the superego and at times is conditioned not to, and I truly think that fixation that debilitate such an attempt can be overwhelming, as to have developed into an 'idee fixe'(Valery)
whose construction has been Romantically developed , by the use and service of paternalistic ideation.
Paternalism is very closely aligned with a broader nationalism, which in effect may obfuscate the ego id complex, as differentiable.
Developmentally the personal-social ramifications of that binary construct can be interrelated on various ascending or descending levels, creating at times unexpected resulting effective-affective jumps.
Jumps can be characterized nominally as seeking escape routes (literally((leaps)) in terms of eternal recurrence with changing of contextual relations ((translates into actual physical contextual changes )) and - figuratively, by the development of phobic alternation of personality features=either consciously or not)
Pan optic conversion of effect into affect is the reason of Sartre's concern with the 'look' and the feature exemplified by Merle Ponti's ' The Visible and the Invisible'.(which has been on my reading list for at least a year, still on the back burner)
Fears of underlying authentication is at the root , almost certainly
In some, a regressive intolerance to the mirror stage, can simulate a hypothetical survival mode of a totally undifferentiated cosmic indifference, as a form of totalized suppression.((and effectively barring literal escape))
Just throwing this out, as in reference to my own underlying casual phobic interference into the unifying, or reunifying efforts of the ego, sans the fixed mix, with very similar and ideal constructions,
I throw the above out only in a mode of expectation, as if, such considerations may shed light on immediate alarming situational considerations, which may be by the passage of a few months , be examined and relaxed with clearer detachment, in line with Your one small step vs. One Giant Step simile.
And I thank You for taking the time with the above, as of to simulate taking notes to configure, and I should warn You again these may merely be working notes , from a particular underground, with inscribed and absolute limits of exposure, within that , there unfortunately never can occuring a consistent field or state without which such an idea may come to terms.
These conditional limits are, and always will be sacro sanct, and there is no question of ever probing beyond them. The only fixed idea which ties this is, into a general scheme, never can come up to the light of day. However in the logistics implies a measure of significance as merely occuring in a litmus test, which simultaneously inscribes the methodology as fusing with the very content of what is measured. Therefore it is merely an input-output dialogue on a different adjacent level, and as Cantor would have liked to comprehend it, reset in both ordinate and inordinate sources of identification.
Please do not bother to try trouble Yourself, except if You care to, through an ad hoc .(got to find the exact term here, and have to source it through one of Guide's forums, to do so- so will stop until I myself as You did , fall into a state of unconsciousness , without actually going to sleep.
Once found the word, I can rest easier.
Later.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users