Backward charged conspiracy

Elevate form over function to get at less easily articulable truths.

Backward charged conspiracy

Postby Meno_ » Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:58 am

"Traditional secular conspiracy theories and explanations of worldly events in terms of supernatural agency share interesting epistemic features. This paper explores what can be called "supernatural conspiracy theories," by considering such supernatural explanations through the lens of recent work on the epistemology of secular conspiracy theories. After considering the similarities and the differences between the two types of theories, the prospects for agnosticism both with respect to secular conspiracy theories and the existence of God are then considered. Arguments regarding secular conspiracy theories suggest ways to defend agnosticism with respect to God from arguments that agnosticism is not a logically stable position and that it ultimately collapses into atheism, as has been argued by N. Russell Hanson and others. I conclude that such attacks on religious agnosticism fail to appreciate the conspiratorial features of God's alleged role in the universe."
Meno_
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7257
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Backward charged conspiracy

Postby Meno_ » Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:07 am

Meno_ wrote:"Traditional secular conspiracy theories and explanations of worldly events in terms of supernatural agency share interesting epistemic features. This paper explores what can be called "supernatural conspiracy theories," by considering such supernatural explanations through the lens of recent work on the epistemology of secular conspiracy theories. After considering the similarities and the differences between the two types of theories, the prospects for agnosticism both with respect to secular conspiracy theories and the existence of God are then considered. Arguments regarding secular conspiracy theories suggest ways to defend agnosticism with respect to God from arguments that agnosticism is not a logically stable position and that it ultimately collapses into atheism, as has been argued by N. Russell Hanson and others. I conclude that such attacks on religious agnosticism fail to appreciate the conspiratorial features of God's alleged role in the universe."





Don't get me wrong. This oblique takeoff would. rather wish to slide into a much more egregious , yet sublimely delicate mind into the extreme position , indicated above, and if it was not so, the charge of mine trolling one's self would hold true.

But it is not one, or one's self which is concerning, but his nemesis , or body double: that gives pause,to such a manner to proceed.

Course , this may or may not give rise to further investigations , and I would personally prefer to remain non attached , in a more or less neutral position.

Anything more would indicate a whisper of trail, a shade of slightly more then mere indifference, in the realm of coincidence .
Meno_
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7257
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Backward charged conspiracy

Postby Karpel Tunnel » Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:19 am

I've pointed out the connection, to atheist conspiracy theorist, between conspiracy theories and theism, at the very least socially.
I wonder how they determined epistemology. One should always go to the stronger advocates of an assertion and not randomly chosen adherents.
You take the average person's defense of evolutionary theory, the theory of relativity, Oficial US history and so on, and you will find yourself with a real epistemological mess and a lot of wrong ideas.
Karpel Tunnel
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3316
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:26 pm

Re: Backward charged conspiracy

Postby Meno_ » Fri Oct 16, 2020 7:10 pm

Karpel says :

: "One should always go to the stronger advocates of an assertion and not randomly chosen adherents"


Quite agreed in a scale of diminishing returns of adherency. looses that, to whatever they can actually attatchthemselves to.

Theistic ' conspiracy ' is reductive, but atheistic conspiracy keeps running a simulated, obsessionally program to fill in the ever increasing gaps , until reality looses it' s objactive ground.

The aesthetic pointillim overtakes the objective perception of the self, and instead of appearing solid, the appearance results in largely as loose attachments pf a porous mess.

This is where Kierkegaard would be constrained to elevate the aesthetic god over that , which should be foundemental.


The Theistic Conspiracy, to inpute a self serving reduction appearently fails at that point.

The only way to get out from such fallacy, is to remember the logical standing of both: The aesthetic is only a simulation of the function of God, within a matrix of incalculable harmonics., upon which , an induction of It's lack is unsupportable The Originals reconstruction, becomes equally insupportable.

At some point, these faux-opposites will tend to follow the same program- to simulate the original standiff, with ever increasing frequency- ( eternally reoccuring) ; until that fallacy, has to align itself with that which it opposes by negative simulation.

Then the universal fallacy appears to reduce it's self to a dark body double. It too gathers just enough power to create the pursuasive illusion of equiminity between the Original and the simulated double.
Meno_
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7257
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Backward charged conspiracy

Postby Meno_ » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:34 pm

And such illusions can only be resisted by an equally seamless ideal, no, not by way of a self depreciating , outright rouge attempt-displayinv all the personal gaps which go but the way of recollection, but by That, which regains It's force of contention , with increasing momentum- by the turn of every new generation.

This idea, was never created at a specific point in time, but grows anew of reflection, every time a metamorphosis becomes the essence of what it means to completely understand why?
Meno_
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7257
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Backward charged conspiracy

Postby Meno_ » Sun Oct 18, 2020 9:33 pm

A total 0 sum of collected conspiracies, can not be had, like adding weights to both plates of a weight measure, either side, if a model/simulation balance, will tend to weigh their own internal fasticity, by semblance to the other that it weighs itself against., then

the various effected parts of extensions are inversely proportional to the measure of extension, since usually seamlessness develops toward a progressively diminishing plane of phenomenal significance.

The sum can never become 0, by virtue of the fact, that increasing subtlety magnifies rather then minimizes phenomenal differences.

That's an irony obvious to those to whom the devil is in the detail.
Meno_
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7257
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum


Return to Creative Writing



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users