If anyone can explain what the below text means, I'll pay him/her $10,000 When we speak a language, we speak using voices. We communicate by means of sound, which is music. If we equate language with music, and say music is identical to language. Then doesn't our mind speak music? Is it fair to say, since we express our Mind by means of Music, that Mind is Music? The human mind has two distinct faculties. 1)Rational & Irrational, 2)Arational 1) The rational & Irrational is expressed by means of a combination of logical or illogical structure and words (signifiers) with meaning attached. 2) The arational or emotional is not adequately expressed by words, but by feelings, which can be expressed in classical music. So, in the beginning. The mind preceeds language and music. Mind is not language. Language is a component of the mind. Our mind is not bound by words, because our mind can also be expressed using classical music "Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." Chapter 11 Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler Pinnacle of Reason BANNED Posts: 1674 Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:21 am Location: Sydney Australia Pay Me Sure, I'll hook you up. someone wrote:If we equate language with music, and say music is identical to language. Then doesn't our mind speak music? They meant to say- We could equate language with music, and say music is identical to language. So, does our mind speak music? You got the typo version. This person also realized that we would not necessarily equate speaking and language with music; then proceeded to exspress some humorous banter to lighten it up further. Pay me. saintanthony9 Posts: 38 Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:11 am You haven't explained all the aspects of the quote. Explain line by line. "Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." Chapter 11 Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler Pinnacle of Reason BANNED Posts: 1674 Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:21 am Location: Sydney Australia damn Damnit! So I guess that means you'll not pay me yet. Alright, this is going to take some time. Oh! So, when it is explained, does it have to make sense? Last edited by saintanthony9 on Tue May 31, 2005 6:59 am, edited 1 time in total. saintanthony9 Posts: 38 Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:11 am of course! If it doesn't make sense, how do I know what it means? which is a precondition for payment. "Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." Chapter 11 Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler Pinnacle of Reason BANNED Posts: 1674 Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:21 am Location: Sydney Australia it means some "grunts" have more meaning than other "grunts"... but this is fun... "2) The arational or emotional is not adequately expressed by words, but by feelings, which can be expressed in classical music. " but it is more often expressed in classical violence... which means of course "Is it fair to say, since we express our Mind by means of Music, that Mind is Music?" becomes "Is it fair to say, since we express our Mind by means of Murder, that Mind is Murder?" "Our mind is not bound by words, because our mind can also be expressed using classical music" actually, our mind is bound by our meninges... and it is never expressed, only interpreted by other minds... -Imp donate the$10,000 to the society of cynics...

-Imp
cogito ergo cogito
sum ergo sum...

Λογοκρισία και σιωπή

What's the difference between a liberal and Al Qaeda?
Oh, you don't know either?

"False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes....Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." (Thomas Jefferson)

"Stat rosa pristina nomine, nomina nuda tenemus" -Eco
Impenitent
ILP Legend

Posts: 12706
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 3:16 pm

Re: Want $10,000? Pinnacle of Reason wrote:If anyone can explain what the below text means, I'll pay him/her$10,000

Sure PoR, I'll "explain" the below text. Get your money ready.

some weirdo wrote:When we speak a language, we speak using voices. We communicate by means of sound, which is music.

This is stating that the human voice is in itself a musical instrument and that by projecting sound we are in fact making a form of music that is taken as "spoken word."

If we equate language with music, and say music is identical to language. Then doesn't our mind speak music?

This line is basically following up what I just said and the answer to the question is "yes," if you believe in the theory of the "spoken word" being a form of music as I explained.

Is it fair to say, since we express our Mind by means of Music, that Mind is Music?

I think this line isn't using the right words to explain the point being made. It makes more sense to say that "since we express our thought by means of music, does that mean our thought is music?" This line is basically stating the same thing as the second line. The answer, in theory, is yes. So what's the point?

The human mind has two distinct faculties. 1)Rational & Irrational, 2)Arational

1) The rational & Irrational is expressed by means of a combination of logical or illogical structure and words (signifiers) with meaning attached.

2) The arational or emotional is not adequately expressed by words, but by feelings, which can be expressed in classical music.

What is the point of saying this anyway? "Arational" isn't even a word, but it's a nice try in the attempt to explain the emotional processes of the brain as opposed to the cognitive.

So, in the beginning. The mind preceeds language and music. Mind is not language. Language is a component of the mind. Our mind is not bound by words, because our mind can also be expressed using classical music.

This is reiterating the truth that music is the universal language. People can speak in words, but the expression and meaning of those words could be misunderstood whereas through music, you can instantly know what is on someone's mind. Music is the language that speaks to the intuition of the mind, which is more easily understood.

Does this help you PoR? If so, I'm waiting to be paid.
I know the truth about ILP.
Sagesound
Sagaciously Auditorial

Posts: 2208
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:28 am

Pinnacle of Reason wrote:If anyone can explain what the below text means, I'll pay him/her $10,000 It seems naive to expect payment when Pinnacle of Reason will be the judge of whether the explanation was adequate. What, if anything, is meant by this text? wrote:When we speak a language, we speak using voices. We communicate by means of sound, which is music. If we equate language with music, and say music is identical to language. Then doesn't our mind speak music? Is it fair to say, since we express our Mind by means of Music, that Mind is Music? The human mind has two distinct faculties. 1)Rational & Irrational, 2)Arational (Neologism) 1) The rational & Irrational is expressed by means of a combination of logical or illogical structure and words (signifiers) with meaning attached. 2) The arational or emotional is not adequately expressed by words, but by feelings, which can be expressed in classical music. So, in the beginning. The mind precedes language and music. Mind is not language. Language is a component of the mind. Our mind is not bound by words, because our mind can also be expressed using classical music The text begins by limiting the meanings of some common words, so that language is considered merely verbal speech, neglecting for example sign language and all other non-verbal symbol systems like this writing, too. Furthermore, communication takes place only through the medium of sound, which is defined as music. Within this restricted vocabulary a tautology is now introduced that to set language equal to music is the same as making music identical to language. Now within this set of narrow definitions and the logic that L = M is the same as M = L there follows this syllogism: If language equals music and music is identical to language, then (our) mind speaks music. Of course this follows within the vocabulary wherein language is only by speech that communicates only by the sound of music. Q.E.D. So much for the logical meaning of this text. Next follows a moot ethical consideration of the "fairness" of saying what's just been said, i.e., "The medium is the messenger." Since mind is expressed through the medium of music; therefore, mind is music. A further set of definitions is imperfectly presented with the mind being divided between rational (logical) and arational (emotional) sides reminiscent of so many other dualities like right brain and left brain, body and soul, God and Satan, and so on. Within this imperfectly focused set of definitions, meanings are considered as attached to words used either logically or illogically whereas emotions cannot be fully shown by words and are expressed by music. Now returning to the beginning, just like the Biblical logos which was with God and was God, mind precedes that division of mind into the rational, logical, verbal left brain versus the arational, emotional, musical right brain. Thus it follows that mind is not merely language, a mere component thereof (Just shown, by definition, to be half or less.) and, of course, then not the entire circumference. Mind, or its emotional side anyway, is also expressed through (classical) music. Again Q.E.D. if one accepts the second, somewhat blurry definitional set. You can pay me at [email protected], but I'm not expecting that anytime soon. Emergent Systems of Self Hierarchically Organized Complexity or ESSHOC (pron. es-shock) are produced by thermodynamic pumps like Earth, living cells, and human brains, which reverse entropy locally while creating Gaia, species, and human culture respectively. ~E ESSHOC Posts: 24 Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:56 pm Location: Japan I want more posts in this thread before I reveal the irony. I am sticking to my promise also. and that I swear by God. "Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." Chapter 11 Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler Pinnacle of Reason BANNED Posts: 1674 Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:21 am Location: Sydney Australia Irony? Pinnacle of Reason wrote:I want more posts in this thread before I reveal the irony. I am sticking to my promise also. and that I swear by God. So, Pinnacle of Reason, by "reveal the irony"? May we take you to be saying that nobody is likely to be paid even though you will, of course, stick by your promise, which somehow also entails that there is no way what-so-ever for aspirants to answer is such a manner as to be worthy of winning your$10,000 prize?

That just seems the most likely meaning of "irony" here because it also automatically lets you off the hook for quite an expensive offer, right?

Pretty much as I expected, though.
Emergent Systems of Self Hierarchically Organized Complexity or ESSHOC (pron. es-shock) are produced by thermodynamic pumps like Earth, living cells, and human brains, which reverse entropy locally while creating Gaia, species, and human culture respectively. ~E

ESSHOC

Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:56 pm
Location: Japan

deleted
Last edited by Dr. Krankenkopf on Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dr. Krankenkopf
BANNED

Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:02 pm

Krankedhead goes for the gold!

Dr. Krankenkopf wrote:.. even the greatest writers bow when the poet passes...

...and when a philosopher passes...

They rudely hold their noses!

They politely ignore it.

You're not getting paid either, Dr. Krankhead, so put your hands back in your pockets.

ESSHOC

Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:56 pm
Location: Japan

song of myself

Pinnacle of Reason wrote:I want more posts in this thread before I reveal the irony.

I am sticking to my promise also. and that I swear by God.

First, my pious PoR, lets not swear lightly. Do you even have $10,000? It's interesting in Plato's Timaeus how the world-soul is constructed of harmonic ratios. So not only are souls made to play music (PoR), but the world is of music as well (Plato). So, I await the big irony. Was this your own idea, Pinnacle? I, for one, find it interestiing. my real name Think deep. Love strong. Create beautily. my real name Philosopher Posts: 2689 Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:26 pm Location: When midway in our life's journey/I found myself in a dark forest/for the right way was lost. You are thinking that money is music to our ears? I dunno... I don't need no stinking money, give it to somebody who needs it. Sheâ„¢ Philosopher Posts: 1120 Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:31 am The arational or emotional is not adequately expressed by words, but by feelings, which can be expressed in classical music. Isn't that where the irony is? If that were true, it could not have been written... right? Well... there's a difference between expressing something adequately, and just talking about it, I guess. Nevermind. Sheâ„¢ Philosopher Posts: 1120 Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:31 am When we speak a language, we speak using voices. We communicate by means of sound, which is music. >> Not all sound is music. One man's car horn is another man's music, I suppose, though. If we equate language with music, and say music is identical to language. Then doesn't our mind speak music? >> Only if the speaker meant to speak musically... and/or only if the 'hearer' interpreted the 'spoken' as musical. Is it fair to say, since we express our Mind by means of Music, that Mind is Music? >> Hm... I don't think so. Music is the vehicle through which the mind expresses itself, whether or not the 'hearer' interprets the expression as it was meant. If the mind never expresses itself, if it is never 'heard' -- doesn't it still exist? Maybe this is saying that... however we can express ourselves is how we will perceive ourselves. However I experience the expression of anger -- that is how I will perceive my angry mind. When my mind is angry, it is frowning, it is loud, it is feverish, it is stomping away... etcetera. I think it's an interesting thing to consider... the whole "embodied mind" idea. Thanks for bringing it up. The human mind has two distinct faculties. 1)Rational & Irrational, 2)Arational >>> I don't get right-off-the-bat how someone could be irrational or illogical on-purpose (could you explain that?). To me it seems more accurate to say 1) rational/cognitive, 2) arrational/emotional -- and I totally disagree that they are distinct. We do them together. 1) The rational & Irrational is expressed by means of a combination of logical or illogical structure and words (signifiers) with meaning attached. >> there are a bunch of different ways to communicate what we are thinking, which is never entirely separate from what we are feeling. The spoken word is merely one way. 2) The arational or emotional is not adequately expressed by words, but by feelings, which can be expressed in classical music. >> there are a bunch of different ways to communicate what we are feeling -- we are made aware of how we feel and the many ways to express it due to our ability for abstract thought. Classical music is merely one way we can utilize to express our feelings. Also, it (classical music) is more cerebral (possibly wrong word) than you make it out to be. So, in the beginning. The mind preceeds language and music. Mind is not language. Language is a component of the mind. Our mind is not bound by words, because our mind can also be expressed using classical music. >>> this is a weird conclusion -- 'cause if the mind preceeds language and music (which I agree) -- then it isn't those things -- the opposite was suggested earlier. Words and classical music both (together with many other ways of communication) express how we think/feel, which are not separate. That was buggin' me... now I feel better. Sheâ„¢ Philosopher Posts: 1120 Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:31 am deleted Last edited by Dr. Krankenkopf on Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total. Dr. Krankenkopf BANNED Posts: 136 Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:02 pm mrn I have$10,000 and I am sticking by my promise
"Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." Chapter 11 Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler

Pinnacle of Reason
BANNED

Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:21 am
Location: Sydney Australia

The Christian's integrity shows...
Uniqor
Philosopher

Posts: 2297
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:52 pm

PoR--

Also -- I don't think emotions are purely alogical (or illogical), either. They don't strike at random -- there is some 'reason' / inner logic behind responding with one emotion and not another, in any given situation. We can effect our emotions through our cognitive processes, and they can likewise shape how we think -- if they were distinct (although I can't help talking about it as if they were separate and acting on eachother... maybe that's what you... or whoever wrote the copy/pasted text... meant by 'distinct'), this would not be possible.

But essentially what the "below text" is saying is that "words" are not the only way to communicate (make music), and may not even be "adequate" for what we are trying to express. But it sure did use a lot of words to say it!

Did you think you could show how triggering our emotional side (want to win $10,000? -- "money talks") would trick us into expressing it with our cognitive side (explain the below text), which would contradict the 'meaning' of the 'below text' you requested we explain (arational or emotional is not adequately expressed by words) -- hence, irony. Ha ha, very funny. Now -- if money is music to our emotional/arational ears -- then why doesn't it make a sound -- is the$10,000 "fictional" if the "meaning" of the "below text" is taken as granted? Or does it stand for a song titled or making you feel like \$10,000? lol

My mind is "humor" apparently, because I only clicked on your thread to see what the joke was all about... Turned out to be sort of interesting.

Sheâ„¢
Philosopher

Posts: 1120
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:31 am

keep on posting, I'll reveal everything tomorrow.
"Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." Chapter 11 Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler

Pinnacle of Reason
BANNED

Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:21 am
Location: Sydney Australia

...cant i just have the money?

embracetrees

Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 6:53 am

Pinnacle of Reason wrote:keep on posting, I'll reveal everything tomorrow.

exhibitionist...

-Imp
cogito ergo cogito
sum ergo sum...

Λογοκρισία και σιωπή

What's the difference between a liberal and Al Qaeda?
Oh, you don't know either?

"False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes....Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." (Thomas Jefferson)

"Stat rosa pristina nomine, nomina nuda tenemus" -Eco
Impenitent
ILP Legend

Posts: 12706
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 3:16 pm

:
When we speak a language, we speak using voices. We communicate by means of sound, which is music.

= a) languages are used thru voices
b) voices are sounds and rythmic, therefore
c) voices are musical

If we equate language with music, and say music is identical to language. Then doesn't our mind speak music?

= a) how is the word "equate" being used?
b) establishes lang = music

Is it fair to say, since we express our Mind by means of Music, that Mind is Music?

= a) trying to establish mind=music, but lang are NOT = voices, though lang are made thru the use of voices so the mind is NOT = music, although it's expressed thru the use of music. Answer = no
b) That's my personal opinion^. Now since the narrator asks the question, we assumes he is right. Then he would be establishing that Mind=Music

The human mind has two distinct faculties. 1)Rational & Irrational, 2)Arational

1) The rational & Irrational is expressed by means of a combination of logical or illogical structure and words (signifiers) with meaning attached.

2) The arational or emotional is not adequately expressed by words, but by feelings, which can be expressed in classical music.

= a) I'm not sure why this is here, exactly. Why does the narrator need to establish the two parts of the mind? Anywho, just take in the info into consideration.

So, in the beginning. The mind preceeds language and music. Mind is not language. Language is a component of the mind. Our mind is not bound by words, because our mind can also be expressed using classical music

= a) how is the word "preceeds" being used?
b) Mind is NOT = Language since Mind can be expressed thru "classical music." Therefore we have proven that Lang is NOT = Mind. Mind is NOT= words. Didn't we say that words were part of language?

THEREFORE:

Lang>Voices>Sounds>Music>?Mind?

BUT...
lang is not = music since the mind can't be "made," only "expressed," thru language. You cannot say the Mind is to be made of Music.

*********************************************************

Conclusion:

One may say that the Mind is to be expressed thru music, which unlike religion does not have 'different' uses of words. Therefore,
Music is the Universal Language, since it can express the Mind, assuming that thoughts are words that can't be arationally expressed bywords.

Notify Me of My Accomplishment or Failure and 'why,' and 'how.'
Thank you for your time!
"The king and the pawn, at the end of the game, go back into the same box."

"There are no whole truths. There are only half-truths, it is the belief of absolute truths that brings out the devil."

"why?"
Robertson

Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:02 am
Location: New Zealand

Music and the Mind

In a condensed form, this is the message the "text below" is sending:

Music is the manifestation of the human spirit, similar to language. Its greatest practitioners have conveyed to mankind things not possible to say in any other language. If we do not want these things to remain dead treasures, we must do our utmost to make the greatest possible number of people understand their idiom.

Arationality cannot be fully expressed thru words, hence we have swear words. Just kidding. On a much higher level, music expresses the mind. It's as simple as that!

The quote was by Dee Dickinson, by the way.
"The king and the pawn, at the end of the game, go back into the same box."

"There are no whole truths. There are only half-truths, it is the belief of absolute truths that brings out the devil."

"why?"
Robertson

Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:02 am
Location: New Zealand

Next