Andersonian Neurology

The origins of the imperative, "know thyself", are lost in the sands of time, but the age-old examination of human consciousness continues here.

Andersonian Neurology

Postby Pedro I Rengel » Sat Feb 12, 2022 6:19 pm

This thread will be to discuss some of Magnus Anderson's theories on the brain. They are psychological theories, but based firmly on the physical brain, so we are treating them as what such theories are, which is neurology. Thus:

Magnus Anderson wrote:
Ichthus77 wrote:Free will isn’t seen best when you choose between red & yellow. C.S. Lewis wrote well about how the moral law in our hearts encourages weak or dampens strong impulses… so that we will then want… higher level wants. Strong impulse that sometimes needs dampening: mother’s “mama bear” impulse. Weak impulse that sometimes needs encouraging: loyalty to wife. There is a desire in us that is higher/deeper than impulse. It’s iambiguous’ hole. Only God fills it. He’s always there… even if we tune all our impulses to drown him out.


If you're doing something, or if you're merely inclined to do something, but at the same feel that you shouldn't be doing that something, then that's a sign that your brain isn't functioning properly and that you're being controlled by destructive and for the most part invisible forces otherwise known as "demons". It's a sign that what you're doing is not of your own "free will".

I have a hypothesis as to what's going on under the hood. The first premise is that our brains are divided into many small components that are interacting with each other via inputs and outputs. The second premise is that the interaction between these components isn't always successful. The third premise is that our brains have a means to detect such failures and minimize their impact. The fourth premise is that the means employed by our brains to deal with such failures involves a special type of components that I shall refer to as "overseers" that do nothing but watch and confirm whether or not messages are being received in their intended form. When an overseer confirms that the message has been received, the receiver is told to proceed doing its job. When it signals an error, the sender is told to resend the message and the receiver is told to wait for a new message. The familiar feeling of "I am doing something that I shouldn't be doing" arises when your brain detects that a negative message sent by an overseer was distorted to a positive one.

I also believe that our overseers are placed strategically rather than uniformly. In other words, they are placed more in some areas of the brain and less in others, something that was probably decided based on which areas of the brain were thought to be used more frequently. Thus, those areas that were more frequently used were better protected -- surrounded by more overseers -- than those that were less frequently used. The less frequently used areas thus became our weak spots that can be abused by others for their own ends. By discovering them and stimulating them, one can easily provoke the aforementioned feeling and even make people insane. The purpose of sexual liberation, for example, might be exactly that (: But that's a different topic.


There is also the possibility that the brain is not actually sensitive to what we might call "external wills," though we will stick with the author's designation of "demons" from here on, necessarily, by design. In fact, it is very possible that the brain at some point underwent significant reformation (redesign) to make it sensitive to demons. That the brain needs them. This might be because it was decided that the brain on its own is not capable of generating enough (either in intensity or variety) new will to keep it competitive. If this were the case, rather than there being overseers, there would be facilitators (for demons), and demons would not, in fact, be able, in any case, to "comandeer" the native brain. Error messages would still, obviously, be required, not to avoid infiltration, but to detect inconsistencies with prioritized aims that preceded the "invited" demon.

Thus, one could postulate an economy in the brain. The brain wants to retain consistencey, but it considers it important also not to stagnate.

In certain cases, which we might call abhorrent or "insanity," the case would then be that a brain considered that the economy led so far away from stagnation, that the reality and risk of stagnation was so high, that it would continue to invite "demons" even beyond points of inconsistency deemed important.

What is important about this?

That an abhorrent or "insane" brain is not a victim of infiltration, rather it wills it. The infiltration exists only and as long as it is willed. The choice is still the native's, and it is a choice of economy, rather than of aim (since we are discussing elements that are constitutive rather than formed of aims).

Sectionalizing the brain as Anderson has seems to me sound, and the implication that there is an economy, too, between them, internally, and access to demons is granted on a "per section" basis.

So what is important is that brains are not "washed" or "controlled" by forces sending demons, or being demons, but rather willingly given to them, entered into free contract with every single time, as a decision on the basis of economy.

And so, rather than judge a demon by what it does to hosts, we are to judge people by what demons they invite, and how they process them (if the demons, for example, even cause enough inconcistncy to produce insanity).

It could be anything from poverty of internal resources to a feeling of a need for protection, to boredom. In any case, as has been asserted, all people have and require demons.
User avatar
Pedro I Rengel
ᛈᛖᛉᛖᛉ
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 2:55 pm

Re: Andersonian Neurology

Postby Pedro I Rengel » Sat Feb 12, 2022 7:03 pm

To follow Freud's lead and bring some Greek mythology into it, why else would Hercules feel a personal responsibility for the slaying of his family, when it was performed while under the influence of a demonic spell or spell of insanity?

Why would he seek an oracle to determine how he could expiate?
User avatar
Pedro I Rengel
ᛈᛖᛉᛖᛉ
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 2:55 pm

Re: Andersonian Neurology

Postby Meno_ » Sat Feb 12, 2022 7:09 pm

Yup, but the deontological supposition of an a-priori manifestation. a general genesis of collateral damage is just S describable as a kind of invasion of somebody snatching the brains out of an unwilling partner or specimen, as it is that of a mindless f..k unwittingly and under duress inviting a demonic entity in.

Is there some kind of contraption which could unhinged this de-differentiated conondrum, as a constructed mechanism of a brain within a machine; or, the other way around?

Can one suggest a worktable solution to this simulated fallacious neo-meta logic? Or truly, cosmic intervention is required?

Irea deus or no bless oblige?
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13270
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Andersonian Neurology

Postby Meno_ » Sat Feb 12, 2022 7:11 pm

Pedro I Rengel wrote:To follow Freud's lead and bring some Greek mythology into it, why else would Hercules feel a personal responsibility for the slaying of his family, when it was performed while under the influence of a demonic spell or spell of insanity?

Why would he seek an oracle to determine how he could expiate?



similar to the more modern sili liliquay as did hamlet asked of his father, sup posring.


Or con next the 2 economies one real and external the other simulated, how one connects to the Other.


failing that , the oracle appeared with an acceptable batting average to solve the apparent stale mate.



FOR 2 rights need necessarily equal a wrong, for a third to appear, .....or, con verse ly suppose.ed
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13270
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Andersonian Neurology

Postby Meno_ » Sat Feb 12, 2022 7:27 pm

Meno_ wrote:
Pedro I Rengel wrote:To follow Freud's lead and bring some Greek mythology into it, why else would Hercules feel a personal responsibility for the slaying of his family, when it was performed while under the influence of a demonic spell or spell of insanity?

Why would he seek an oracle to determine how he could expiate?



similar to the more modern sili liliquay as did hamlet asked of his father, sup posring.


Or con next the 2 economies one real and external the other simulated, how one connects to the Other.


failing that , the oracle appeared with an acceptable batting average to solve the apparent stale mate.



FOR 2 rights need necessarily equal a wrong, for a third to appear, .....or, con verse ly suppose.ed




Please tell me even the smaller part of it. If not will not hold against it's principal manifestation


The easiest part is to denounce logic in favor of a meta linguistic try at clarity. And that is a deonyological fallacy at most

Shy away from real contradiction opens another can of worms that can not be put back . the linger and linger as pandora has demonstrated kindly put as irrelavance, denying it's self ( the connection) in the first place- that is why the ID is still in heated contension.



S further backup to Hamlet's sorcery,


" double double toil and trouble" a tacit understanding may be in the works, at least on my side, to assume some sta ility of real elation , toward the possible under standing of minimally substantiated assumptions.

Between two .


However. , me two. as me know may be mistaken.
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13270
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Andersonian Neurology

Postby Ichthus77 » Sat Feb 12, 2022 8:56 pm

If science is verifying communication between spirits, human or otherwise (through junk they are doing w AI, say), then the implication is we are hardwired for at least One Other… but others can… what… hack it… a) if we are vulnerable, b) allow it, or c) allow more than One Other…

If only One Other belongs in the holiest of holies (if God is a “jealous god”), then all others gotta stop trying… booting them is necessary…

The ones who take advantage of vulnerabilities (without His permission/direction) are going to get dealt with first.

My two sense.
Fall semester ends 12/16/22. Apologies if I do not reply immediately.

“In choosing myself, I choose the other.”
- A marriage of Sartre & Levinas
User avatar
Ichthus77
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6053
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: pale blue clump of star particles

Re: Andersonian Neurology

Postby Meno_ » Sat Feb 12, 2022 9:17 pm

Only possible exit since fallacy trumps contradiction in all honesty, is to trancend the factual into the creative aspects of forums, or do a double take and appear to escape as hudini. tried to get out from the pressures of the undertow, and stay there that perhaps not to shipwreck and find one's self as did Robinson cursor in a new stranger in a strange world situation.

But that's not too bad for some one re searching for another one down there, as long as it takes.

There may not be conceivably any other found who not hope to re turn to a new relation between the good book and that of the call of the wild east.

At any rate took ok with it for so many reasons not understood. as if I did not really believe in interpretation as in dreams, that once were contextually held as invalid yet tentible tacital knowledge.

I am absolutely certain of it.

and searching for a bester way.



I
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13270
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum


Return to Psychology and Mind



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron