by iambiguous » Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:35 pm
Iain McGilchrist
There are, it seems to me, four main pathways to the truth: science, reason, intuition and imagination.
On the other hand, in regard to intuition and imagination, what particular truth might that be?
The statement that ‘there is no such thing as truth’ is itself a truth statement, and implies that it is truer than its opposite, the statement that ‘truth exists’. If we had no concept of truth, we could not state anything at all, and it would even be pointless to act. There would be no purpose, for example, in seeking the advice of doctors, since there would be no point in having their opinion, and no basis for their view that one treatment was better than another. None of us actually lives as though there were no truth. Our problem is more with the notion of a single, unchanging truth.
That and [sigh] distinguishing between truth in the either/or world and in the is/ought world.
...the brain is often described as if it were composed of bits – ‘modules’ – of one kind or another, which have then to be strung together, it is in fact a single, integrated, highly dynamic system. Events anywhere in the brain are connected to, and potentially have consequences for, other regions, which may respond to, propagate, enhance or develop that initial event, or alternatively redress it in some way, inhibit it, or strive to re-establish equilibrium.
What event? Connected to what other event? My own trivial quandary.
...we might have to revise the superior assumption that we understand the world better than our ancestors, and adopt a more realistic view that we just see it differently – and may indeed be seeing less than they did.
For example?
These are not different ways of thinking about the world: they are different ways of being in the world. And their difference is not symmetrical, but fundamentally asymmetrical.
A "world of words" in particular.
Literal language, by contrast, is the means whereby the mind loosens its contact with reality and becomes a self-consistent system of tokens.
Truly, he suspected, they just can't not note things like this.