Dutch Divorce Rate Skyrockets In Response To Alimony Reform

[mannequin01]

damn, women have no mercy!..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaTanxWCkcg

[Zero_Sum]

Filed under: Whores being whores....

[mannequin01]

Theyre just not even trying to hide it now are they?..it's all on public display too..it will never be forgotten.

[promethean75]

the entitlement of alimony is a property law brought into existence by the same system that sanctions the origin of the family. next, this (patriarchal) system aggravates the tension between genders and their respective economic roles, finally to produce the movement we call 'feminism'.

and yet everybody is scratching their heads wondering what's happening. strange, that.

[mannequin01]

Poor Robin Williams got caught up in all this, maybe if he transitioned to Mrs doubt fire he could of avoided all this. ...

[Zero_Sum]

the entitlement of alimony is a property law brought into existence by the same system that sanctions the origin of the family. next, this (patriarchal) system aggravates the tension between genders and their respective economic roles, finally to produce the movement we call 'feminism'.

and yet everybody is scratching their heads wondering what's happening. strange, that.

Problem: Out of control hypergamic materialistic overly entitled women, sluts, and whores worldwide. Systematic worldwide fertility crisis, destruction of family, destruction of marriage, population decline, low birthrates, and the overall alienation of modern man.

Solution: Reinstall a strong patriarchal male dominated government and culture that reins in on these out of control women [cunts] worldwide under a set of harsh draconian laws that will stomp them out of existence.

Sidenotes: Marxist social utopian drivel or unicorns isn't the answer.

[Zero_Sum]

When western nations economically, socially, politically, and existentially collapses it's going to be open season on these bitches.

We men will not forget how we've been treated from 1965 to present day, show them no fucking mercy or quarter. Punish them all, punish every single one of them by reining them in.

[promethean75]

Solution: Reinstall a strong patriarchal male dominated government and culture that reins in on these out of control women [cunts] worldwide under a set of harsh draconian laws that will stomp them out of existence.

lol... and start the whole circus over again. i give you five hundred years before you're right back where we are now. dutch chicks divorcing for alimony cuz they tryn to get paid cuz they broke.

[Zero_Sum]

Everybody is laughing about the disproportionate large single, sexless, and unmarried population of men now especially the overly entitled female cunt brigade but as western nations collapse one by one into total chaos or lawlessness these cunts are store for a huge shock when confronted by a large angry population of single horny men, western feminism will not survive and will shortly die afterwards. Women will be re-subjugated and thinking upon those prospects zero fucks are given by me concerning the aftermath.

The pendulum is going to swing back very brutally right onto the asses of western feminists everywhere.

Everybody jokes about female hypergamy, female cunts included, that is until they figure out that it will eventually on a long enough historical timeline be met with a violent brutal crackdown on women everywhere.

The supply of dicks and pussies via sexual intercourse concerning repopulation must flow.

[Zero_Sum]

Solution: Reinstall a strong patriarchal male dominated government and culture that reins in on these out of control women [cunts] worldwide under a set of harsh draconian laws that will stomp them out of existence.

lol... and start the whole circus over again. i give you five hundred years before you're right back where we are now. dutch chicks divorcing for alimony cuz they tryn to get paid cuz they broke.

Nope, once western feminism has been exposed for the self destructive fraud that it is men worldwide will make sure it is eradicated never to return ever again. We've discovered overtime that when women are allowed their independence they in turn move towards activities that destroy whole societies, nations, and civilizations.

Once western feminism is destroyed and in reality it pretty much is destroying itself, the next few hundred years will be one where the Jack boot is firmly placed on women's necks in order to make sure it never returns again.

[promethean75]

these cunts are store for a huge shock when confronted by a large angry population of single horny men

and here our post-apocalyptic paths would cross, old friend, because it would be my mission to protect the hotties from you and your band of lawless ruffians.

[Zero_Sum]

these cunts are store for a huge shock when confronted by a large angry population of single horny men

and here our post-apocalyptic paths would cross, old friend, because it would be my mission to protect the hotties from you and your band of lawless ruffians.

Good luck with that white knight. There is more single men than there are those married or in relationships, you'll lose against greater superior numbers. Volume, numbers, or density always wins every single time.

[Zero_Sum]

Problem--->Reaction ---->Solution.

[Gloominary]

the entitlement of alimony is a property law brought into existence by the same system that sanctions the origin of the family. next, this (patriarchal) system aggravates the tension between genders and their respective economic roles, finally to produce the movement we call 'feminism'.

and yet everybody is scratching their heads wondering what's happening. strange, that.

The, origin, of the family, what?
While the family adapts to the sociopolitical, economic and technological system of the day, and in turn, the system adapts to the family, the family itself has no origin, it's primordial.

[promethean75]

oops my bad i meant to say something like 'paring marriages' but i forgot to speak engelish.

In the old communistic household, which comprised many couples and their children, the task entrusted to the women of managing the household was as much a public and socially necessary industry as the procuring of food by the men. With the patriarchal family, and still more with the single monogamous family, a change came. Household management lost its public character. It no longer concerned society. It became a private service; the wife became the head servant, excluded from all participation in social production. Not until the coming of modern large-scale industry was the road to social production opened to her again – and then only to the proletarian wife. But it was opened in such a manner that, if she carries out her duties in the private service of her family, she remains excluded from public production and unable to earn; and if she wants to take part in public production and earn independently, she cannot carry out family duties. And the wife’s position in the factory is the position of women in all branches of business, right up to medicine and the law. The modern individual family is founded on the open or concealed domestic slavery of the wife, and modern society is a mass composed of these individual families as its molecules.

In the great majority of cases today, at least in the possessing classes, the husband is obliged to earn a living and support his family, and that in itself gives him a position of supremacy, without any need for special legal titles and privileges. Within the family he is the bourgeois and the wife represents the proletariat. In the industrial world, the specific character of the economic oppression burdening the proletariat is visible in all its sharpness only when all special legal privileges of the capitalist class have been abolished and complete legal equality of both classes established. The democratic republic does not do away with the opposition of the two classes; on the contrary, it provides the clear field on which the fight can be fought out. And in the same way, the peculiar character of the supremacy of the husband over the wife in the modern family, the necessity of creating real social equality between them, and the way to do it, will only be seen in the clear light of day when both possess legally complete equality of rights. Then it will be plain that the first condition for the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex back into public industry, and that this in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic unit of society.

so you see what we gotta do, glooms. we need to restructure the whole thing or the feminists might very well destroy us. paring marriages in the private sector have to go because that old-ass shit is what's causing this epidemic.

[Gloominary]

oops my bad i meant to say something like 'paring marriages' but i forgot to speak engelish.

In the old communistic household,

Firstly, what households is Engels talking about here?
The households that existed right before the advent of capitalism in Europe, or further back and abroad?
Because households weren't monolithic before capitalism, there were different ways of organizing them.

Secondly, capitalism didn't invent private property.
Every society had a mix of private and public property, and of hierarchy and heterachy.
Capitalism extolled private, but in practice it too was a mix.
Families always tended to look out for themselves and theirs first, and they always will, and there's nothing wrong with that, in fact it's normal, natural and healthy.

which comprised many couples and their children,

Before capitalism, families tended to be extensive, after capitalism, nuclear.

Within families, property tended to be shared, but between families, hoarded.

the task entrusted to the women of managing the household was as much a public and socially necessary industry as the procuring of food by the men.

And it's not now?
A mom with kids is protected and provided for, either by her husband and/or the state, whether she stays with or divorces him.

With the patriarchal family, and still more with the single monogamous family, a change came. Household management lost its public character. It no longer concerned society. It became a private service;

I'm not exactly sure how things were in the 19th century, but today, we don't have a patriarchal family, fathers/husbands and/or the state owe mothers/wives provisions, she doesn't have to sell herself into servitude or slavery for them, if he withholds them from her she can take half or more of his.
But even if she did have to sell herself into servitude for them, then that would be fair, if men are giving women something, it's only fair they're getting something about equal in return i.e. baths, massages, blowjobs, dinner, etcetera.
The moment mothers/wives stop providing these services for or divorce fathers/husbands to live on their own or off government, they're not entitled to anything from them.

the wife became the head servant, excluded from all participation in social production. Not until the coming of modern large-scale industry was the road to social production opened to her again – and then only to the proletarian wife. But it was opened in such a manner that, if she carries out her duties in the private service of her family, she remains excluded from public production and unable to earn; and if she wants to take part in public production and earn independently, she cannot carry out family duties. And the wife’s position in the factory is the position of women in all branches of business, right up to medicine and the law. The modern individual family is founded on the open or concealed domestic slavery of the wife, and modern society is a mass composed of these individual families as its molecules.

In the great majority of cases today, at least in the possessing classes, the husband is obliged to earn a living and support his family, and that in itself gives him a position of supremacy,

No, it makes him a slave to his wife.
He is obliged to protect and provide for her, but she's not obliged to him for anything.
She doesn't even have to stay with him or look after their kids, she can divorce him, let him keep the kids or give them up for adoption, and still take much or most of his money.
And of course she has the sole right to abort their kids (if it's a woman's right to choose whether their unborn children live or die, then it's a man's right to choose whether he's responsible for them or not), and most of the time she gets custody even when custody is sought by both her and him.

without any need for special legal titles and privileges. Within the family he is the bourgeois and the wife represents the proletariat. In the industrial world, the specific character of the economic oppression burdening the proletariat is visible in all its sharpness only when all special legal privileges of the capitalist class have been abolished and complete legal equality of both classes established. The democratic republic does not do away with the opposition of the two classes; on the contrary, it provides the clear field on which the fight can be fought out. And in the same way, the peculiar character of the supremacy of the husband over the wife in the modern family, the necessity of creating real social equality between them, and the way to do it, will only be seen in the clear light of day when both possess legally complete equality of rights. Then it will be plain that the first condition for the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex back into public industry, and that this in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic unit of society.

What Engels is advocating for here is the complete enslavement of man to his wife.
He is a female supremacist.

so you see what we gotta do, glooms. we need to restructure the whole thing or the feminists might very well destroy us. paring marriages in the private sector have to go because that old-ass shit is what's causing this epidemic.

You are a misandrist, and you are trying to destroy the family, unbeknownst to you or not.

[Zero_Sum]

the entitlement of alimony is a property law brought into existence by the same system that sanctions the origin of the family. next, this (patriarchal) system aggravates the tension between genders and their respective economic roles, finally to produce the movement we call 'feminism'.

and yet everybody is scratching their heads wondering what's happening. strange, that.

The, origin, of the family, what?
While the family adapts to the sociopolitical, economic and technological system of the day, and in turn, the system adapts to the family, the family itself has no origin, it's primordial.

The problem with Marxists is that they can't or just don't understand biological inheritance. They instead trivialize everything under social constructs like a magical wand trying to deconstruct everything.

Ironically the social constructs they try to deconstruct everything with is just another extension of biological inheritance. Biological extensions determine social constructs.


Of course this is what we can expect from a naive social utopian model like Marxism.

[promethean75]

Once western feminism is destroyed

You'll have to get through Dinah-Moe Humm first. Frank will show you how it's done.

[Gloominary]

Promethean, are you saying the state should pay mothers money to cover the costs of taking care of their children and themselves, even if they and/or the fathers can cover the costs themselves?

[Gloominary]

the entitlement of alimony is a property law brought into existence by the same system that sanctions the origin of the family. next, this (patriarchal) system aggravates the tension between genders and their respective economic roles, finally to produce the movement we call 'feminism'.

and yet everybody is scratching their heads wondering what's happening. strange, that.

The, origin, of the family, what?
While the family adapts to the sociopolitical, economic and technological system of the day, and in turn, the system adapts to the family, the family itself has no origin, it's primordial.

The problem with Marxists is that they can't or just don't understand biological inheritance. They instead trivialize everything under social constructs like a magical wand trying to deconstruct everything.

Right, they believe virtually all differences, particularly differences in ability, empathy and sympathy, between individuals, families and races can be explained by (early) nurturing and mimetics rather than nature and genetics.
They believe we're all equally valuable and that at our core, underneath the (early) nurturing and mimetics, equally capable and conscientious.
The difference between national socialists on the one hand and Marxist socialists on the other is we just want what we see as a fairer and more balanced economic hierarchy, whereas they want to eliminate hierarchy altogether.

They want to eliminate the family, culture and race by polyamory, miscemimation and miscegenation, whereas we want to preserve them.
They want to eliminate the family by the state paying mothers (and fathers, I'm sure many of them want to do away with the notion of fathers altogether) just to have, raise and rear kids, even if mothers (and fathers) can pay for them themselves.
They want to eliminate gender, sex and even species by transgenderism, transsexualism, transhumanism and human-animal hybridization.

Ironically the social constructs they try to deconstruct everything with is just another extension of biological inheritance. Biological extensions determine social constructs.

Yea, funny that.

Of course this is what we can expect from a naïve social utopian model like Marxism.

Too right.

[Peter Kropotkin]

after reading this thread full of ignorance and total nonsense,
I hope, I sincerely hope, none of you is married or ever have children....

and for those who can't find a date... let me be the first to tell you,
because you are ignorant beyond belief... it is scary how little you know
about women or anything else for that matter.....but what I find to be the truly
scary part, is that you have no idea, no clue as to how ignorant you are.....

I hope you never have the chance to breed and have the ability to
spread your complete and total ignorance to the next generation....

Kropotkin

[Gloominary]

after reading this thread full of ignorance and total nonsense,
I hope, I sincerely hope, none of you is married or ever have children....

and for those who can't find a date... let me be the first to tell you,
because you are ignorant beyond belief... it is scary how little you know
about women or anything else for that matter.....but what I find to be the truly
scary part, is that you have no idea, no clue as to how ignorant you are.....

I hope you never have the chance to breed and have the ability to
spread your complete and total ignorance to the next generation....

Kropotkin

I hope you have to bury your children and grandchildren, if you have any.

[Gloominary]

What Marxists want is UBI, everyone to get paid 10 grand or so just for existing, and then whatever they make on top of that from their job if they have one they get to keep after after taxes.
What this would mean for relationships is an unemployed/underemployed woman could cohabit with or marry an employed man without being dependent on him.
As national socialists, we believe every able-bodied person should work for a living, and that patriarchy, where women serve men who protect/provide for them, is a valuable institution.

[Zero_Sum]

after reading this thread full of ignorance and total nonsense,
I hope, I sincerely hope, none of you is married or ever have children....

and for those who can't find a date... let me be the first to tell you,
because you are ignorant beyond belief... it is scary how little you know
about women or anything else for that matter.....but what I find to be the truly
scary part, is that you have no idea, no clue as to how ignorant you are.....

I hope you never have the chance to breed and have the ability to
spread your complete and total ignorance to the next generation....

Kropotkin

I plan on having lots of children, if I have a son I'll name him Peter.

Men like yourself make me laugh. Women are simple enough, sexual capitalists that charge for their social company and physical sexual interactions. You pay the biological prostitute to have children with. With the vending machine between their legs just stick 100s inside them in order to reproduce.

[Zero_Sum]

Once western feminism is destroyed

You'll have to get through Dinah-Moe Humm first. Frank will show you how it's done.

It really does mind boggle me how most people can't see how our entire societies is on the verge of collapse, chaos, and total breakdown. When it occurs everything people take advantage of today including women as a given will no longer exist, it's as simple as that.