
Would it be unethical for me to take the pro-global warming side from a perspective of advocating a chain of poorly interconnected psuedo-science, connected together by ethnically motivated jingoist pogroms, and veil it all as a well thought out system that others should adopt? It would be a assertion of a Liberal Progressivism / Truth, the best of the best I've heard used over the years. It can't be wrong if I don't really believe in any if that crap in the first place, to be your sparring partner in this?
I'll think I can fake support for global warming fairly well. I'll convince everyone that I'm a true believer, and will lead everyone down my labyrinth of concoctions and misdirection. When in doubt, I'll PM Peter Kropotkin as my lifeline. Everyone is going to want to launch ash filled rockets into the atmosphere to block out the sun and save the day after I'm done. Sulfuric Acid Blocking Sunlight Everywhere!
