by Meno_ » Mon Jun 20, 2022 3:18 pm
Now here is jumping through the ring of quantum fire, insipid through abysmal darkness~ seeing as if two can eyeball , until blinking and/ or seeing the white of their eyes.
Here is CS Lewis paraphrased:
"Christ either deceived mankind by conscious fraud, or He was Himself deluded and self-deceived, or He was Divine. There is no getting out of this trilemma. It is inexorable."
Now, the deconstruction of the self, in cubism, tantamount arguibly between neurology and psychiatry, in line with Picasso's representation, begs Lewis' question up above.
For instance, and this is reverting to 'Museing' the deconstruction of representation unto it's formal macroscopic elements, not be a visual explosion of identity, that came after Picasso's doubly flattened effect, overcoming the trajectory if the deontological split from Descarte through Sartre?
In fact, did not that echo through another allegory , (but reversely) from Moses through Jesus?
The deconstruction could have had an interrelational reversibility between the old and the new , the new being split again into the modern and the postmodern.
But this course has been implicit in the archaic prophecy which was still being assembled, constructed with a view to
establish Creedence ( credo).
So that, perhaps, the word, would establish, on a futuristic course, the gravity, the weight of resonance that the magnet of logical absolute, can draw to itself this parts of the phenomenal cube, that draws it's self toward It's self, ...
And that is the significance that the particular abstraction I was looking for, and not giving up search for.
This magnetism idea was as significant in French science , as existentially derived analysts of the psyche have tried to decipher.
The line drawn there is also drawn from Sartre's self thought man to images of pre cybernetic delusions of modern science to this of earlier ines, encapsulated by the greatest doubter : the 'evil genious'.