Moderator: Carleas
Ichthus77 wrote:If you mean what I was referring to when I unintentionally pit felix and iambiguous against eachother, I can.
If you are doing the same as iambiguous (and you & Meno, etc) in acting like I am (or y’all are) other usernames, based on an experience I mentioned I had back in 2005… I already said I was going to stop. Though, I just now connected those dots. You gonna stop?? Plausible deniability?
For my part, it was not done out of malice… or even intentionally.
I would be interested in getting the perspective of those who intentionally confuse folks… and turn around and accuse others of doing things intentionally that they didn’t intend… and caution them to stop doing what they (you) may (you tell me) have no intention of stopping.
There is always a reason people do what they do. Do you think you have hit on the bigger Yes … or do you think you’ve gone bigger?
Proof all are slaves. Just a matter of which “yes” possesses you. Be possessed by the biggest Yes, or be possessed by less than Yes… I guess (I only said that because it rhymes… which reminds me… if iambiguous is okay with the way I jest, I will not dampen my personality for you… thththththanks).
Ichthus77 wrote:Are you…? Did you just…? Meh.
Ierrellus wrote:Sculptor is still spewing out venomous ad homs in the Devolution thread.
MagsJ wrote:Ierrellus wrote:Sculptor is still spewing out venomous ad homs in the Devolution thread.
Perhaps he wants to be banned.
Ierrellus wrote:MagsJ wrote:Ierrellus wrote:Sculptor is still spewing out venomous ad homs in the Devolution thread.
Perhaps he wants to be banned.
Nah. He equates banning with censorship.
Ierrellus wrote:The sad part of this is that he produces a little good scholarship, surrounded by vile opinion of others, It's rant, rant, rant, good stuff, rant, rant, rant.
For me, the rant obscures the good stuff.
MagsJ wrote:Ierrellus wrote:The sad part of this is that he produces a little good scholarship, surrounded by vile opinion of others, It's rant, rant, rant, good stuff, rant, rant, rant.
For me, the rant obscures the good stuff.
He’s been asked what compels him to descend into that place of ranting, but Sculptor doesn’t seem to want to respond to that inquiry.
Perhaps replying to posts when One is in a lighter mood, would be a better choice to make..?
Easier said than done, though..
MagsJ wrote:Ierrellus wrote:The sad part of this is that he produces a little good scholarship, surrounded by vile opinion of others, It's rant, rant, rant, good stuff, rant, rant, rant.
For me, the rant obscures the good stuff.
He’s been asked what compels him to descend into that place of ranting, but Sculptor doesn’t seem to want to respond to that inquiry.
Perhaps replying to posts when One is in a lighter mood, would be a better choice to make..?
Easier said than done, though..
Ierrellus wrote:MagsJ wrote:Ierrellus wrote:The sad part of this is that he produces a little good scholarship, surrounded by vile opinion of others, It's rant, rant, rant, good stuff, rant, rant, rant.
For me, the rant obscures the good stuff.
He’s been asked what compels him to descend into that place of ranting, but Sculptor doesn’t seem to want to respond to that inquiry.
Perhaps replying to posts when One is in a lighter mood, would be a better choice to make..?
Easier said than done, though..
He has responded to the rant question by suggesting that he is just being firm. I had a boss once who treated me like shit. In her defense, she said she was only being firm. She was a bitch who hated men.
iambiguous wrote:On the other hand, I'm not for banning them. I kind of like making complete fools out of them.
Sculptor wrote:I am directly criticising those American who all claim to support free speach whilst a that same time supporting a thread to ban someone.
gib wrote:Who exactly are they? I know Magnus wants to ban you but I haven't heard him speak in defense of free speech.
If you're accusing them of hypocrisy, it means you think they want to ban you because they don't like what you say. That's the whole point of the first amendment. The right to free speech isn't a right that trumps all other rights. You can want to ban someone because they're speech violates other rights (or forum rules).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users